Beyond the Death of the Author: Textual Authority, Oral Traditions, and the Ethics of Reading

Authors

  • Techi Takam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24113/smji.v14i2.11682

Keywords:

Roland Barthes, authorship, oral literature, post-structuralism, indigenous narratives, reader response theory

Abstract

This paper re-examines Roland Barthes’ seminal essay The Death of the Author (1967) by situating it within the historically specific conditions of Western, text-centric literary culture. While Barthes’ argument is often celebrated for liberating the text from authorial intention, it emerges from a tradition shaped by Romantic individualism, print capitalism, and the institutionalisation of the author as a figure of authority. By placing Barthes in dialogue with oral and indigenous narrative traditions—where authorship is collective, fluid, or culturally embedded—this study argues that Barthes’ thesis is not a universal theoretical rupture but a contextual methodological critique. The paper further contends that an uncritical application of Barthesian anti-authorialism risks erasing marginalised voices for whom authorship functions as political presence and cultural self-representation. Re-reading Barthes through these alternative narrative epistemologies enables a more ethically attentive model of interpretation, one that balances textual plurality with cultural accountability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Techi Takam

Masters in English and Master of Philosophy

Arunachal Institute of Tribal Studies

Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India

References

Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. In S. Heath (Trans.), Image–Music–Text (pp. 142–148). Fontana. (Original work published 1967)

Finnegan, R. (2012). Oral Literature in Africa. Open Book Publishers.

Foucault, M. (1977). What Is an Author? In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice (pp. 113–138). Cornell University Press.

Rathore, G. S. (2025). Pragmatic shifts in Indian English: A diachronic analysis of politeness strategies in academic writing. Frontiers in Social Sciences Research, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24113/jt84gd81

Hooks, B. (1989). Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. South End Press.

Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Methuen.

Shams, A. T. (2022). Ecologized humanity versus humanized ecology: Critical approach to camera narratives in cinematic arts. International Journal Online of Humanities, 8(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v8i4.251

Saussure, F. de. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. Columbia University Press.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.

Downloads

Published

17-02-2026

How to Cite

Takam, T. (2026). Beyond the Death of the Author: Textual Authority, Oral Traditions, and the Ethics of Reading. SMART MOVES JOURNAL IJELLH, 14(2), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.24113/smji.v14i2.11682