Beyond the Death of the Author: Textual Authority, Oral Traditions, and the Ethics of Reading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24113/smji.v14i2.11682Keywords:
Roland Barthes, authorship, oral literature, post-structuralism, indigenous narratives, reader response theoryAbstract
This paper re-examines Roland Barthes’ seminal essay The Death of the Author (1967) by situating it within the historically specific conditions of Western, text-centric literary culture. While Barthes’ argument is often celebrated for liberating the text from authorial intention, it emerges from a tradition shaped by Romantic individualism, print capitalism, and the institutionalisation of the author as a figure of authority. By placing Barthes in dialogue with oral and indigenous narrative traditions—where authorship is collective, fluid, or culturally embedded—this study argues that Barthes’ thesis is not a universal theoretical rupture but a contextual methodological critique. The paper further contends that an uncritical application of Barthesian anti-authorialism risks erasing marginalised voices for whom authorship functions as political presence and cultural self-representation. Re-reading Barthes through these alternative narrative epistemologies enables a more ethically attentive model of interpretation, one that balances textual plurality with cultural accountability.
Downloads
References
Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. In S. Heath (Trans.), Image–Music–Text (pp. 142–148). Fontana. (Original work published 1967)
Finnegan, R. (2012). Oral Literature in Africa. Open Book Publishers.
Foucault, M. (1977). What Is an Author? In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice (pp. 113–138). Cornell University Press.
Rathore, G. S. (2025). Pragmatic shifts in Indian English: A diachronic analysis of politeness strategies in academic writing. Frontiers in Social Sciences Research, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24113/jt84gd81
Hooks, B. (1989). Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. South End Press.
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Methuen.
Shams, A. T. (2022). Ecologized humanity versus humanized ecology: Critical approach to camera narratives in cinematic arts. International Journal Online of Humanities, 8(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v8i4.251
Saussure, F. de. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. Columbia University Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Techi Takam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
