Identifying Peer-Reviewed Journals

Understanding the distinction between different types of journals is essential for academic research. Faculty members frequently require students and scholars to cite peer-reviewed, refereed, or scholarly journals, but what does “peer-reviewed” actually mean, and why does it matter so much?

What Is a Peer-Reviewed Journal?

A peer-reviewed journal is a scholarly publication in which submitted articles are critically evaluated by experts in the same field before publication. This evaluation—referred to as “peer review” or “refereeing”—ensures that the research meets high standards of quality, accuracy, and academic integrity.

In many cases, the peer review process is double-blind, meaning both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This anonymity fosters impartiality and objectivity.

Such rigor makes peer-reviewed articles far more credible than content published in general magazines, blogs, or unverified online platforms.

Types of Publications: A Quick Comparison

  • Popular Sources (e.g., newspapers, general magazines): Articles are typically written by journalists or general writers. These sources may be informative but lack academic reliability.

  • Trade or Professional Journals: Often authored by industry experts, these may discuss trends or practice-based insights. However, they may not always be peer-reviewed.

  • Scholarly or Peer-Reviewed Journals: These focus on original research and are written by experts. Each article undergoes rigorous review by other academics to uphold scholarly standards.

How to Verify if a Journal Is Peer-Reviewed

If your library or research database does not allow filtering for peer-reviewed content, consider using trusted reference tools:

Using Ulrichsweb Global Serials Directory:

  1. Go to .

  2. Use the alphabetical menu to navigate to the “U” section and select Ulrichsweb.

  3. Enter the full title of the journal (include “A,” “An,” or “The” if it’s part of the title).

  4. Look for the refereed symbol (a referee’s jersey icon) next to the journal name. This confirms its peer-reviewed status.

For example, SMART MOVES Journal IJELLH is proudly listed in the Ulrich’s Global Serials Directory as a refereed (peer-reviewed) publication.

Insert Screenshot Here for Visual Confirmation

Why Faculty Require Peer-Reviewed Sources

University faculty emphasize the use of peer-reviewed journals to ensure academic rigor and scholarly integrity. This requirement is also grounded in guidelines issued by the University Grants Commission (UGC) of India.

UGC Guidelines and Peer-Reviewed Journals

According to the UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018, faculty members must publish in peer-reviewed or UGC-listed journals.

This directive ensures that research is held to objective benchmarks, thereby elevating the standards of Indian higher education.

Publishing in verified peer-reviewed journals also helps researchers steer clear of predatory publications that compromise academic ethics and violate UGC norms.

While the original UGC-CARE list received criticism for its inconsistencies and was eventually discontinued, updated frameworks continue to emphasize peer-reviewed research. Please click on below link to find details:

UGC Dissolves UGC-CARE List

Impact on API and PBAS Scores

The Academic Performance Indicators (API) and the Performance Based Appraisal System (PBAS) rely heavily on publications in refereed journals. These metrics determine faculty promotions and career progression in universities and colleges. Please click on below link to find details:

UGC API Score Calculator

Closing Thoughts

Understanding and utilizing peer-reviewed sources is not merely about meeting academic requirements—it’s about upholding the values of integrity, critical inquiry, and scholarly excellence that define higher education. By choosing peer-reviewed publications, researchers not only enhance the credibility of their own work but also contribute to the collective advancement of academic knowledge.