Linguistic Stereotyping, Gendered Representation, and the Shifting Portrayal of Women in Hindi Cinema: A Sociolinguistic Corpus Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24113/smji.v14i8.11876Keywords:
Hindi Cinema, Sociolinguistics, Linguistic Stereotyping, Gendered Language, Sexist Language, OTT, Film CorpusAbstract
Hindi popular cinema in its studio era as well as in its OTT era has been an enduring medium through which speaker types have been socially encoded. The paper uses a bounded corpus of 2025 Hindi language feature films (40 theatrically released and two long-form web series) to explore how the language and paralinguistic decisions create and produce stereotypes of regions, religion, class, occupation, and gender, and how these decisions have changed in the OTT era. The unit of analysis is the character-scene, which is an individual character in an identifiable scene; utterances, accent features, lexical selection, address form and code-mixing are coded as embedded units. Operationalization of six stereotype categories is done by explicit indicator sets and not by impressionistic labels. Gendered language is distinguished from sexist language as the former is grammatical or referential, the latter evaluative and derogatory, placing women in an inferior, subordinate, or consumable position. Dialogue in Hindi–Urdu language is consistently romanised, and each cited example includes a romanised original, an English translation, identification of the speaker, and context for the scene. The paper shows that, while the stereotype grammar of Bihari-as-comic, Christian-as-westernized, English-speaking-woman-as-morally-suspect has been somewhat replaced, it has not been eliminated from the OTT corpus and that gendered-language markings continue to be used even though overt sexist framings are absent.
Downloads
References
Bazin, A. (1967). The ontology of the photographic image. In What is cinema? (Vol. 1, pp. 9–16; H. Gray, Trans.). University of California Press.
Bordo, S. (1986). The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs, 11(3), 439–456.
Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. University of Wisconsin Press.
Green, L. (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Harvey, S. (1978). Woman’s place: The absent family of film noir. In E. A. Kaplan (Ed.), Women in film noir (pp. 22–34). British Film Institute.
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Center for Applied Linguistics.
Metz, C. (1974). Film language: A semiotics of the cinema (M. Taylor, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Morin, E. (1956). Le cinéma, ou l’homme imaginaire (L. Mortimer, Trans., 2005). University of Minnesota Press.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18.
Roberge, G. (1992). The subject of cinema studies: Film theory and interpretation of films. Ajanta Publications.
Sahai, V., et al. (2024). Exploring Indian cinema: Languages, cultural diversity, and cinematic art. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, 11(2).
Shekhar, M. (2016). Cinema ka safar. Rajkamal Prakashan.
Sibal, V. (2018). Stereotyping women in Indian cinema. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(43).
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Suman, M. (2023). Changes in the portrayal of women in the OTT era and the shifting scales of language. Streekal, 5, 79–83.
Tecucianu, D. (2014). The ‘language’ of cinema: Film ‘grammar’ and visual literacy. International Journal of Communication Researc
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Manjri Suman, Riya Raj, Srijana Jaiswal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
